Vickery v. OLIN HILL CONST. CO., INC.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
On a defendant’s motion for directed verdict at the close of a plaintiffs evidence, the evidence must be taken as true and considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and the motion may be granted only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for the plaintiff. Dickinson v. Poke, 284 N.C. 576, 201 S.E. 2d 897 (1974). A plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of every reasonable inference which may legitimately be drawn from his evidence. Bowen v. Gardner, 275 N.C. 363, 168 S.E. 2d 47 (1969); Jenkins v. Starrett Corp. 13 N.C. App. 437,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hardy v. TolerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Pinnix v. ToomeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Johnson v. OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hull v. OldhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Sinning v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Lee v. KeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Kim v. Professional Business Brokers Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Tise v. Yates Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.