Legal Opinion

Vickery v. OLIN HILL CONST. CO., INC.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1980No. 7920SC789PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

On a defendant’s motion for directed verdict at the close of a plaintiffs evidence, the evidence must be taken as true and considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and the motion may be granted only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for the plaintiff. Dickinson v. Poke, 284 N.C. 576, 201 S.E. 2d 897 (1974). A plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of every reasonable inference which may legitimately be drawn from his evidence. Bowen v. Gardner, 275 N.C. 363, 168 S.E. 2d 47 (1969); Jenkins v. Starrett Corp. 13 N.C. App. 437,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hardy v. TolerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Pinnix v. ToomeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Johnson v. OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hull v. OldhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Sinning v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Lee v. KeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Kim v. Professional Business Brokers Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Tise v. Yates Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API