Legal Opinion
Hull v. Oldham
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided September 3, 1991No. 9021SC308PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge.
Procedural History
Both plaintiffs alleged in their complaints five claims for relief: (1) gross negligence or negligence on the part of each individual defendant: (2) liability of defendant Oldham and his bonding company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, under his official bond; (3) liability of defendant. Oldham’s deputies and lieutenants and another bonding company, Hartford Accident and Casualty Company, under a separate bond issued to Forsyth County; (4) liability of defendant McCrary as Sheriff of Davidson County and his bonding company, Western Surety Company,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Parker v. AmersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Harter v. VernonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Hedrick v. RainsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Boyd v. Robeson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Davis v. MesserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Clark v. Red Bird Cab Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.