Kim v. Professional Business Brokers Ltd.

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendants’ Appeal

Defendants all contend that the court erred in failing to submit issues to the jury on their counterclaims on the notes. These contentions have no merit. Defendants did not object in a timely manner to the court’s failure to submit these issues. Even if the defendants had timely objected, the court’s failure to submit the issues was not prejudicial error. There was no issue of fact as to plaintiffs liability on the notes other than the question of fraud. If the jury found a defendant engaged in fraud, then that defendant was not entitled to recover on his or…