Legal Opinion

Pinnix v. Toomey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 30, 1955No. 531PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff’s Appeal.

JohnsoN, J.

The plaintiff’s appeal challenges the rulings of the court below in striking from the complaint allegations which incorpo rate and refer to specific portions of the contract between the defendants and the Board of Education of Mecklenburg County.

The plaintiff’s cause of action sounds in tort. He seeks to recover damages for the alleged actionable negligence of the defendants. Nevertheless, he contends that the pleaded sections of the contract embrace ultimate facts, relevant and pertinent to the statement of his cause of action, as tending to show the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Council v. Dickerson's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Watkins v. Taylor Furnishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Daniel v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Woodard v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Hinson v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Collingwood v. General Electric Real Estate Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Clark v. DalmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. North Carolina State Ports Authority v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Eric Eisenberg v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API