Sinning v. Clark
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, John C., Judge.
I
Although the trial court’s order purported to grant summary judgment in favor of defendants, the parties have stipulated that no extraneous materials were before the court; thus, defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion was not converted into one for summary judgment and the appropriate standard of review is that applicable to a Rule 12(b)(6) ruling. Whitfield v. Winslow, 48 N.C. App. 206, 268 S.E.2d 245, disc. review denied, 301 N.C. 405, 273 S.E.2d 451 (1980). That standard of review is “whether, as a matter of law, the allegations of the complaint, treated as true, are…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Braswell v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Dixon v. StuartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Lynn v. Overlook DevelopmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Isenhour v. HuttoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Stone v. North Carolina Department of LaborSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Hunt v. North Carolina Department of LaborSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Hedrick v. RainsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Grant Construction Co. v. McRaeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.