Legal Opinion

Sinning v. Clark

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 18, 1995No. COA94-1106PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, John C., Judge.

I

Although the trial court’s order purported to grant summary judgment in favor of defendants, the parties have stipulated that no extraneous materials were before the court; thus, defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion was not converted into one for summary judgment and the appropriate standard of review is that applicable to a Rule 12(b)(6) ruling. Whitfield v. Winslow, 48 N.C. App. 206, 268 S.E.2d 245, disc. review denied, 301 N.C. 405, 273 S.E.2d 451 (1980). That standard of review is “whether, as a matter of law, the allegations of the complaint, treated as true, are…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Braswell v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Dixon v. StuartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Lynn v. Overlook DevelopmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Isenhour v. HuttoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Stone v. North Carolina Department of LaborSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Hunt v. North Carolina Department of LaborSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Hedrick v. RainsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Grant Construction Co. v. McRaeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API