Sullins v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Paul Goodsell Sullins, in pro. per., for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of California that petitioner be publicly reproved. Petitioner presently is 69 years old, was admitted to practice in California in April 1953, and has no prior record of discipline in California or in Illinois, where he practiced law from 1930 to 1953.
The disciplinary board’s. recommendation is based on findings by a local administrative committee of the State Bar that petitioner deliber ately misled the Los Angeles County Superior Court by concealing the existence of a letter…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Demain v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Pickering v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Bluestein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re SilvertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Linnick v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Codiga v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Weir v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Hartford v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re UtzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Di Sabatino v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.