Legal Opinion

In Re Utz

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1989No. S005651PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

We review the unanimous recommendation of the Re view Department of the State Bar Court that petitioner, Jerome C. Utz, be disbarred from the practice of law. The recommendation is based on petitioner’s conviction of seven counts of mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341) and two counts of using interstate transportation to defraud individuals (18 U.S.C. § 2314).

We placed petitioner on interim suspension, to commence on March 2, 1984, pending the finality of petitioner’s conviction. In July 1986, after petitioner’s conviction was final, we referred the matter to the State Bar for…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. United States v. Richard Daniel Freeman, Robert Temp and Alaine Carter Temp, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Christian Research Institute v. AlnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against KossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BereanoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. Christian Research Institute v. AlnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API