Legal Opinion

Hartford v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1990No. S006239PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

The Review Department of the State Bar Court (Review Department) has recommended that John J. Hartford (petitioner) be suspended from the practice of law for six months, that execution of the suspension order be stayed and that petitioner be placed on probation for one year, subject to conditions, including actual suspension for thirty days.

In one matter, the Review Department found petitioner failed to communicate with his clients and failed to take timely or substantial action in the case for which he was retained; in a second matter, the Review Department found petitioner…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Greenbaum v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Guzzetta v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re SeveroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Dixon v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Calvert v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Lipson v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Middleton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Dudugjian v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Read v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API