Legal Opinion
People v. Porter
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 25, 1947No. Crim. No. 4164PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
We have for consideration (1) a motion for the augmentation of the record on appeal, and (2) an appeal from a judgment of guilty of violating section 245 of the Penal Code (assault with a deadly weapon) after trial before the court without a jury.
The Motion for Augmentation of the Record
Defendant asks this court to augment the record on appeal by having included therein (1) the arguments of the district attorney and defendant’s attorney before the trial court, and (2) the record of the judgment in case number 23386 of the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles.
The purpose of such motion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. PianezziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Hamilton v. KelseyOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Thex v. ShreveWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. ConternoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- D. I. Nofziger Lumber Co. v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Tran v. Eat Club CA6California Court of Appeal · 2020