Legal Opinion

People v. Riley

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1951No. Crim. 5185PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*512SPENCE, J.

In a proceeding initiated, pursuant to section 3701 of the Penal Code, to determine the sanity of defendant Leandress Riley, who was then incarcerated in San Quentin under a final judgment imposing the death penalty, a jury found him to be “presently sane.” The trial court accordingly made its order pursuant to section 3703 of the Penal Code; and from such order defendant attempts to take this appeal.

On September 20, 1949, defendant was found guilty of first degree murder and was sentenced to be executed. The judgment was affirmed by this court upon an automatic appeal. (People v.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Solesbee v. BalkcomSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Nobles v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. People v. SuesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Hoffman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re KeatonOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. McCracken v. TeetsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. McCracken v. TeetsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API