Legal Opinion

People v. Conterno

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1942No. Crim. 3528PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From judgments of guilty on two counts of statutory rape after trial before the court without a jury, defendant appeals.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (respondent), the essential facts are:

Defendant on two occasions had an act of sexual intercourse with the prosecuting witness, a female sixteen years of age.

Defendant relies for reversal of the judgments upon two propositions which will be stated and discussed hereunder seriatim.

First: There is no substantial evidence to sustain the findings upon which the judgments were necessarily predicated.

This proposition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. PianezziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. People v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. AlvaradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People v. StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. People v. LewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API