People v. Conterno
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From judgments of guilty on two counts of statutory rape after trial before the court without a jury, defendant appeals.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (respondent), the essential facts are:
Defendant on two occasions had an act of sexual intercourse with the prosecuting witness, a female sixteen years of age.
Defendant relies for reversal of the judgments upon two propositions which will be stated and discussed hereunder seriatim.
First: There is no substantial evidence to sustain the findings upon which the judgments were necessarily predicated.
This proposition…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. PianezziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. AlvaradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. LewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.