Legal Opinion

D. I. Nofziger Lumber Co. v. Solomon

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 18, 1910No. Civ. No. 813PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.

Consolidated action to foreclose mechanics’ liens. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant owners appeal from judgment and order denying their motion for a new trial.

The record on appeal is made up in accordance with a stipulation “that no point is made onfihis appeal as to any pleading, nor as to any papers in the judgment-roll, in said actions, except as herein mentioned,” and consists of the findings and judgment and a bill of exceptions. The questions presented for consideration are: (1) Was the clause in the contract which provides for the retention of $500, instead of $625, as the final…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hampton v. ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Burnett v. GlasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Germania Building & Loan Ass'n v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Los Angeles Pressed Brick Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Goldtree v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  2. Sweet v. Fresno Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Lyons v. HowardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
  4. People v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. San Pedro Lumber Co. v. KreisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API