Legal Opinion

People v. Pianezzi

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1940No. Crim. No. 3353PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

These are appeals by(1) Defendant Peter Pianezzi from three judgments of guilty of robbery in the first degree and(2) Defendant Martin E. McGowan from two judgments of guilty of robbery in the first degree, after trial before a jury.

There are also appeals from the orders denying their motions for a new trial.

Viewing the evidence most favorable to the people (respondent), the facts are:

July 21, 1939, defendants Pianezzi and McGowan together with a third man held up and robbed the Hill and Atlantic Branch of the Security First National Bank at Long Beach, each of the robbers at the time being…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. FerdinandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. SykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. People v. LindsayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API