Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Kelsey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1928PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

First, we shall determine whether the court erred when it denied the motions for a nonsuit and a directed verdict; these two assignments of error we shall consider together. Before the plaintiff could recover, it was necessary that a preponderance of the evidence should establish that the defendant was negligent in one or more of the particulars set forth in the complaint, and that such negligence was the proximate cause of the injury to her physical condition of which she made complaint. Let us now ascertain whether the evidence supplied these two necessary elements. When the defendant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Woodward v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Langford v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Kinlen v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. Whitesell v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Burk v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Goldfoot v. LofgrenOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hryciuk v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Wemett v. MountOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Baker v. WycoffUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Horn v. National Hospital AssociationOregon Supreme Court · 1942

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API