Iphaar v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLABORNE, Judge.
This special action calls into question the constitutionality of the procedure for a timely filing of an industrial claim under Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 23-947 (Supp.1991). Because portions of the statute do not comport with constitutional requirements, we set aside the award. The facts upon which this decision are based are as follows:
The petitioner employee sustained an industrial eye injury February 3, 1981. A workers’ compensation claim was filed, accepted for benefits, and a permanent im pairment was ultimately awarded and the file was then closed. In…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Parsons v. Bekins FreightArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- In the Matter of Park Nursing Center, Inc., Debtor. Creditors Committee of Park Nursing Center, Inc. v. Richard SamuelsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Comeau v. Arizona State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Kessen v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Word v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Hart v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Conroy v. hutchinson/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021