Legal Opinion

Iphaar v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 23, 1992No. 1 CA-IC 90-136PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLABORNE, Judge.

This special action calls into question the constitutionality of the procedure for a timely filing of an industrial claim under Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 23-947 (Supp.1991). Because portions of the statute do not comport with constitutional requirements, we set aside the award. The facts upon which this decision are based are as follows:

The petitioner employee sustained an industrial eye injury February 3, 1981. A workers’ compensation claim was filed, accepted for benefits, and a permanent im pairment was ultimately awarded and the file was then closed. In…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Parsons v. Bekins FreightArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  5. In the Matter of Park Nursing Center, Inc., Debtor. Creditors Committee of Park Nursing Center, Inc. v. Richard SamuelsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Comeau v. Arizona State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. Kessen v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Word v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. Hart v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Conroy v. hutchinson/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API