Legal Opinion

Kessen v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 9, 1999No. 1 CA-IC 98-0040PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERCH, Judge.

¶ 1 The Kessens, Claimant Lynn Stewart’s uninsured employer, seek special action review of the Industrial Commission of Arizona’s (“ICA”) affirmance of the lump-sum commutation of Claimant’s workers’ compensation award. The Kessens assert that, as Claimant’s employer, their consent was required before the ICA could commute Claimant’s award of unscheduled permanent partial disability benefits to a lump sum. We hold that it was not. On cross-petition, Claimant challenges the ICA’s reduction of the lump-sum award by subtracting the monthly disability payments made to him…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Ruth v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Martin v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. State of Arizona v. Abel Daniel HidalgoArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Circle K Stores, Inc. v. Apache CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. T.W.M. Custom Framing v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. State v. OaksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API