Legal Opinion
Comeau v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 13, 1999No. 1 CA-CV 98-0344PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOYES, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant, a dentist, was censured by the State Board of Dental Examiners after it conducted an investigative interview in response to a patient’s complaint. Appellant sought judicial review, the superior court affirmed, and Appellant filed this appeal. We conclude that Appellant received a due process hearing, that he waived his right to a formal hearing, and that the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence.
I
¶ 2 The Board investigated Appellant based on a complaint by a patient regarding transitional dentures and related treatment she received from…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Fleury v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc. v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Webb v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Bd. of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Gaveck v. Arizona State Board of Podiatry ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Emmett McLoughlin Realty, Inc. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.