Word v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.
We hold in this opinion that an administrative law judge (“ALJ”), when awarding workers’ compensation after a hearing, cannot modify a caption to include as an employer an individual who has not received notice of the claim or the opportunity to be heard.
I
The respondent employee (“claimant”), injured in a fall, filed a workers’ compensation claim that listed as his employer “Word or Pacific Mechanical” at 5513 Morning Vista Lane, Cave Creek, Arizona, 85331. The Industrial Commission (“commission”) sent a noninsured employer letter to Pacific Mechanical at the Cave Creek…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stephens v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Iphaar v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
3Cited by6 opinions
- Special Fund Division v. TaborCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Unisource Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- State ex rel. Industrial Commission v. WordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- STATE EX REL. INDUS. COM'N v. WordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State ex rel. Industrial Commission v. WordArizona Supreme Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.