Legal Opinion

Word v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 12, 1993No. 1 CA-IC 92-0143PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Judge.

We hold in this opinion that an administrative law judge (“ALJ”), when awarding workers’ compensation after a hearing, cannot modify a caption to include as an employer an individual who has not received notice of the claim or the opportunity to be heard.

I

The respondent employee (“claimant”), injured in a fall, filed a workers’ compensation claim that listed as his employer “Word or Pacific Mechanical” at 5513 Morning Vista Lane, Cave Creek, Arizona, 85331. The Industrial Commission (“commission”) sent a noninsured employer letter to Pacific Mechanical at the Cave Creek…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Iphaar v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Special Fund Division v. TaborCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. Unisource Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Industrial Commission v. WordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. STATE EX REL. INDUS. COM'N v. WordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. State ex rel. Industrial Commission v. WordArizona Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API