Legal Opinion

Hart v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 1, 1994No. 1 CA-IC 92-0189PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Judge.

We are asked to set aside an Industrial Commission award that dismissed as untimely the request for hearing filed by Petitioners, an uninsured employer. Three questions are presented:

1. Is Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 23-947(A), which limits an uninsured employer’s protest period to thirty days, unconstitutional?

2. Were the notices of determination issued in this case so ambiguous and confusing that they denied the employer due process of law?

3. Did a notice of determination amending two prior notices of determination prevent the earlier notices from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Findley v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Iphaar v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. Gila Valley Block Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kessen v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API