Noon v. KNAVEL
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
Appellant, the General Telephone Company of Pennsylvania, contends that the lower court erred in failing to grant its motion for judgment non obstante veredicto on the grounds that its negligence was not the proximate cause of appellee Noon’s injuries.
Appellant, a public utility, was the owner of a public telephone booth which was located immediately adjacent to the grade crossing of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad at Bedford Street in the City of Johnstown. The telephone booth was located approximately 9% feet from the curb *203of Bedford Street, and only five feet from the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Whitner v. LojeskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Burrell v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- FLICKINGER ESTATE v. RitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Amabile v. Auto Kleen Car WashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Vasilenko v. Grace Family ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Mike v. Borough of AliquippaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Albert v. AlterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.