Legal Opinion

Amabile v. Auto Kleen Car Wash

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1977No. 1448 and 682PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

Appellants, Michael and Rose Amabile, appeal from orders granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellees. Appellants contend that the court below erred in granting the motions for summary judgment under Rule 1035 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure 1 because material issues of fact clearly existed on the record.

On March 10, 1971, plaintiff-appellant, Michael Amabile had his car washed at the Auto Kleen Car Wash in Philadelphia, and then parked it in the vacuum area, provided by appellee, Auto Kleen, for the use of its patrons. As he was leaning over the trunk…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Phaff v. GernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. FLICKINGER ESTATE v. RitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Ritmanich v. Jonnel Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. McFadden v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
  2. Yaindl v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. Standard Pump-Aldrich DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Wicks v. Milzoco Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. United States v. WadeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Weiss v. Keystone MacK Sales, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API