Legal Opinion

Burrell v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1970No. Appeal, No. 5PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Pomeboy,

This action in trespass arose out of a collision between a truck, owned by defendant Philadelphia Electric Company, and driven by defendant Everett K Fowler, an employee of the Electric Company, and a bicycle upon which the minor plaintiff Ricardo Burrell was riding. Plaintiffs sought recovery for the minor plaintiff’s personal injuries alleging that the injuries were caused by the negligence of defendant Fowler acting within the scope of his employment. A jury trial resulted in verdicts in favor of the defendants. The court en banc granted plaintiffs’ motion for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones Et Vir v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Austin v. RidgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Carroll v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Brown v. McLean Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. St. Clair Cemetery Ass'n v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Kiser v. SchulteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Baldino v. CastagnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API