Legal Opinion

Vasilenko v. Grace Family Church

California Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 2017No. S235412PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Even if Bonanno can inform the duty question here, our discussion of Seaber and Schwartz in that case makes clear that the key consideration in Bonanno -the mobile nature of the bus stop-is not present in this case. We explained that the bus stop in Bonanno easily could have been moved to a less dangerous location, an option not available to the hotel in Seaber .

*1094( Bonanno , supra , 30 Cal.4th at p. 152, 132 Cal.Rptr.2d 341, 65 P.3d 807.) We found that the bus stop was more like the bakery truck belonging to the defendant street vendor in Schwartz , who owed a duty to a child patron injured…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Davis v. Westwood GroupMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Schwartz v. Helms Bakery LimitedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Swett v. Village of AlgonquinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Bonanno v. Central Contra Costa Transit AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. S. Cal. Gas Co. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.(In Re S. Cal. Gas Leak Cases)California Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Hodges v. Hertz Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  4. QDOS, Inc. v. Signature Fin., LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Univ. of S. Cal. v. Superior Court of Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API