Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co. v. Lewis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; N. E. McNeill, Judge. Action by tlie Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company against S. R. Lewis and John M. Ingram on indemnity bond, Judgment for plaintiff for less than sued for, and it 'brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtElting-, J.
This action was brought by plaintiff in error for reimbursement of money which it had paid as surety under a bond executed by the Ingram Oil company. Recovery by the plaintiff in errbr against the defendants in error was sought under a bond executed by the defendants in error, indemnifying the plaintiff in error against loss incurred by it as surety for the Ingram Oil company. Both bonds bear the same date and are a part of the same transaction. The cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts, and judgment rendered for plaintiff in error, allowing only one of the accounts which it had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Remington v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Cowles v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
- Grafton v. HinkleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Pacific Bridge Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
- Loveland v. TantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beams v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. RunklesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Brown v. EddingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Goff v. LathanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. GillamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.