Legal Opinion

Loveland v. Tant

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 27, 1919No. 9315PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from County Court, Tillman County; W. H. Hussey, Judge. Action by T. O. Loveland against Chas. S. Tant. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action upon a promissory note for $50, commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendant in error, defendant below.

The action was commenced before a justice of the peace, was tried without any written pleadings on the part of the defendant, and resulted in a judgment in his favor. It is contended that the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant ought to be reversed for the reasons: /

“(1) That nearly all of defendant’s testimony was improper and that part heretofore set out under assignment No. 11. should have been excluded on plaintiff’s objection;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ellis v. OutlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Butler v. McSpaddenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Buckner v. Oklahoma National Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beams v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. RunklesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Investors Mortgage Security Co., Ltd. v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Board of Com'rs of Grady Co. v. LenochanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API