Goff v. Lathan
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
KANE,,, J..
In this proceeding in error cojinsel for plaintiff in error have filed a brief which, appears . to reasonably . sustain their -assignments of error.
The defendant in error has-filed no" brief and has offered no excuse for failure '-'to do so.
Bit' is well settled that where the plaintiff in error has filed a complete record in the Supreme Court and has served and filed a brief in compliance with the rules of ■ the court, and the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for such failure, the Supreme Court is not required to - search'the record to find some…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Silva v. SilvaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Lawton Nat. Bank v. UlrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Incorporated Town of Kusa v. BouggousSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Russell & Washington v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Obialero v. Henryetta Spelter Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cherokee Mills v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Nelson v. BlasdelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923