Legal Opinion

Goff v. Lathan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 8, 1923No. 11004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KANE,,, J..

In this proceeding in error cojinsel for plaintiff in error have filed a brief which, appears . to reasonably . sustain their -assignments of error.

The defendant in error has-filed no" brief and has offered no excuse for failure '-'to do so.

Bit' is well settled that where the plaintiff in error has filed a complete record in the Supreme Court and has served and filed a brief in compliance with the rules of ■ the court, and the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for such failure, the Supreme Court is not required to - search'the record to find some…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Silva v. SilvaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Lawton Nat. Bank v. UlrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Incorporated Town of Kusa v. BouggousSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Russell & Washington v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Obialero v. Henryetta Spelter Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cherokee Mills v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Nelson v. BlasdelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API