Legal Opinion
Remington v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1902No. 4177PublishedCited by 37 opinions
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. William O. Chapman, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mount, J.
Appellant about the month of May, 1898, employed one John F. Bishop as his cashier and bookkeeper in the city of Tacoma. At the time of this- employment Mr. Bishop was required to furnish to appellant a surety company bond protecting appellant against dishonesty. Respondent on July 12, 1898, issued its bond, substantially as follows:
“Whereas, John Franklin Bishop, hereinafter called the ‘employee,’ has been appointed to the position of cashier and bookkeeper in the service of William H. Remington, hereinafter called the ‘employer,’ and has…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Moulor v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Guarantee Co. of North America v. Mechanics' Sav. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Horsfall v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- National Surety Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- American Bonding Co. v. MorrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Cowles v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
- Bacigalupi v. Phoenix Building & Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.