Pacific Bridge Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Bell, J., entered July 30, 1902, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff hy direction of the court, after overruling defendant’s motions for a directed verdict or a nonsuit.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
This is an appeal from a final judgment for plaintiff in an action on a bond given to plaintiff, the contractor in chief for the construction of subdivision No. 1 of the Cedar River water supply system of the city of Seattle, by the defendant Charles P. Church, a subcontractor for the performance of the excavation on a certain part of that subdivision, and by the defendant, the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, as his surety, conditioned for the faithful performance of his contract, etc. The defendant Church was never served with process, nor has he appeared in the action, and the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cowles v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
- State ex rel. Bartelt v. LiebesWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Baum v. County of WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fidelity Deposit Co. of Baltimore, Md. v. RainerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Columbia Digger Co. v. RectorDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Washington National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Costello v. BridgesWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Kanters v. KotickWashington Supreme Court · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.