Legal Opinion

Cowles v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1903No. 4703PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. William E. Richardson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

The defendant Creutzer entered into a contract in writing with appellant, whereby Creutzer agreed to construct a dwelling for appellant. The contract provided that Creutzer should give a surety bond in the sum of $3,000 to secure the performance of all the terms of the contract. Respondent became surety on the bond so required. Creutzer failed to comply with the contract. Appellant completed the work and brought this action to recover $3,000, which amount he alleges he paid, to complete the dwelling in excess of the contract price. At the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. . MollesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Benjamin v. HillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Remington v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Grafton v. HinkleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Getchell & Martin Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Peterson & SampsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. George A. Hormel & Co. v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. National Surety Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  4. M. H. Walker Realty Co. v. American Surety Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Title & Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API