Legal Opinion
Lewis v. Bayh
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 9, 2008No. Civil Action 07-0939 (RMU)PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss I. INTRODUCTION
This case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs amended complaint. The pro se plaintiff, George M. Lewis, brings suit against Senator Evan Bayh, cataloguing and attributing ten years of personal difficulties to the defendant’s involvement in a civil conspiracy to violate his Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3), 42 U.S.C. § 1986 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Tooley v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Bickford v. Government of the United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Proctor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- ['Mizell v. Suntrust Bank']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Bond v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.