Legal Opinion
['Mizell v. Suntrust Bank']
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 18, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1077PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Isadore Mizell (“Mizell”), who is proceeding pro se, filed the instant complaint in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia on June 18, 2013. Mizell alleges that Defendant SunTrust Bank (“Defendant” or “SunTrust”) improperly closed the bank account for Mizell’s travel agency business without first notifying him, (Complaint (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1-1, ¶ 4), and maintains that Defendant is liable for defamation (Count I), and breach of contract (Count II). (Id ¶ 14.) On July 15, 2013, Defendant removed the case…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Al Jazeera America, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Brookens v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Union Station Venture LimitedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Park Southern Neighborhood Corporation v. Vesta Management CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Wood v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.