Legal Opinion
Bond v. U.S. Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 6, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-1617PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
William C. Bond, proceeding pro se, brings this action against the U.S. Depart ment of Justice (“the DOJ”) and DOJ officials (collectively “federal defendants”), the Washington Post, and its reporter Manuel Roig-Franzia (collectively “the Post”). With respect to the federal defendants, Bond seeks damages and mandamus relief for violations of his constitutional rights in connection with the federal defendants’ failure to investigate matters that Bond referred to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland for prosecution. With respect to the…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bond v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Stevens v. Sodexo, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Maxberry v. Department of the Army, Board of Correction of Military RecordsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Sluss v. United States Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.