Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Goddard v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 9, 2003No. 1 CA-CV 02-0238PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

¶ 1 R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (“Reynolds”) appeals from the grant of summary judgment to the State of Arizona and the denial of its own motion for summary judgment. At issue is the interpretation of a provision in a Master Settlement Agreement entered into by the parties. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶2 In 1998, the State of Arizona, along with forty-five states, the District of Columbia, and five territories, entered into a Master Settlement Agreement (“MSA”) with Reynolds and four other tobacco companies. The MSA ended litigation brought by the various governments seeking to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Smith v. Melson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Bennett v. Baxter Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. United Dairymen of Arizona v. SchuggCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. In re the Marriage of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. State v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API