State Ex Rel. Goddard v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEISBERG, Judge.
¶ 1 R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (“Reynolds”) appeals from the grant of summary judgment to the State of Arizona and the denial of its own motion for summary judgment. At issue is the interpretation of a provision in a Master Settlement Agreement entered into by the parties. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶2 In 1998, the State of Arizona, along with forty-five states, the District of Columbia, and five territories, entered into a Master Settlement Agreement (“MSA”) with Reynolds and four other tobacco companies. The MSA ended litigation brought by the various governments seeking to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Smith v. Melson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Bennett v. Baxter Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- United Dairymen of Arizona v. SchuggCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- In re the Marriage of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- State v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.