Luckel v. White
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GAMMAGE, Justice.
This suit concerns the construction of a royalty deed in which the “granting,” “ha-bendum” and “warranty” clauses recite that a V32nd royalty interest is conveyed, but the “subject to” and “future lease” clauses state that the grantee shall be entitled to receive one-fourth of any and all royalties. The grantee’s successors (Luck-el, et al.) sought declaratory judgment that the deed conveyed an interest in one-fourth of the royalties reserved under all subsequent leases and an accounting for oil and gas production on the land. Both sides moved for summary judgment. The…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
- Sheffield v. HoggTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Woods v. SimsTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Schlittler v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Altman v. BlakeTexas Supreme Court · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by368 opinions
- Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- ConocoPhillips Co. v. KoopmannTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Indian Beach Property Owners' Ass'n v. Linden, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Concord Oil Co. v. Pennzoil Exploration and Production Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Hysaw v. DawkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2016
363 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.