Legal Opinion
In Re Schmolke
California Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1926No. Docket No. Crim. 2840PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The petitioner seeks a release on habeas corpus from his detention by the chief of police of the city and county of San Francisco. He was arrested pursuant to a warrant issued upon the filing of a complaint in the police court of said city and county charging him with a misdemeanor in that he did, on the twenty-first day of September, 1925, engage in the business of transporting property for hire upon and over the public highways of the state of California without having obtained a license so to do as required by the Motor Vehicle Transportation License Tax Act, approved May 28, 1925 (Stats.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hewitt v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- In Re PeppersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Bacon Service Corporation v. Huss.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- County of San Luis Obispo v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Carley & Hamilton, Inc. v. Snook Chief of the Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Pacific Coast Dairy v. Police CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Rainey v. MichelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Sutton v. TangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.