Legal Opinion

Carley & Hamilton, Inc. v. Snook Chief of the Division of Motor Vehicles

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1930No. 86 and 267PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

These are appeals under § 266 of the Judicial Code, from final decrees of District Courts of three judges for the Northern District of California. Each, on motion to dismiss the complaint, dissolved a temporary injunction, dismissed the complaint and upheld the constitutionality of § 77 (b) and (c) of the Motor Vehicle Act of California, 1923 California Statutes, c. 266, as amended, 1927 California Statutes, c. 844. Section 36 (a) requires every motor vehicle operated upon the public highways of the state to be registered. Under § 77 (a) an annual fee of $3.00 is exacted for the registration…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API