California Improvement Co. v. Reynolds
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial. E. B. Ogden, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Action upon a street assessment. The defendants filed a general demurrer to the complaint, which was *90overruled, and the cause was thereafter tried and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendants have appealed.
1. Section 3 of the street improvement act declares that, after the passage of the resolution of intention to order the improvement, the resolution “shall he posted conspicuously for two days on or near the chamber door of the council.” The complaint herein alleges that the council “directed its clerk to publish and post said resolution of intention for two…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Porphyry Paving Co. v. AnckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Byrne v. Luning Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by18 opinions
- Anderson v. FullerSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
- Gay v. EngebretsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Hadley v. DagueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Hatfield v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- City of Bluffton v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.