Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Guardian Holding Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1933No. Docket No. 7654PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DESMOND, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment awarding plaintiff the sum of $2,352.06, made up as follows: $1,000 for time lost by plaintiff in preparing to enter into a garage business on premises of defendant; $1,000 for conversion of certain personal property belonging to plaintiff; $126.43 for wages of a watchman guarding said personalty; $225.83 for loss sustained by plaintiff in relation to articles of equipment which he purchased in anticipation of engaging in said garage business. In totaling the specific items above mentioned, an error of twenty cents in favor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Paige v. O'NealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Sargent v. SturmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Burnham v. AbrahamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Schnierow v. BoutagyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Fergus CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. McCulloch v. LiguoriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Hough v. Jay-Dee Realty and Investment, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. A. A. Baxter Corp. v. Colt Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Kaye v. MelzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API