Beatty v. H. B. Owsley & Sons, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
I
The questions presented by plaintiffs second assignment of error are (1) whether the evidence shows negligence by Owsley 3 ; and (2) whether the evidence shows plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. The standard is so well known that it needs no citation: A defendant’s motion for a directed verdict made under Rule 50(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure presents the question of whether the evidence is sufficient to go to the jury. All of the plaintiffs evidence must be taken as true, and the plaintiff must be given the benefit of every reasonable inference…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mature v. AngeloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Clark v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Clark v. BodycombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Weaver v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Presnell v. PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harris v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Stanford v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Eatman v. BunnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Kunz v. Beneficial TemporariesUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Dickerson v. AME, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.