Legal Opinion

Stanford v. Owens

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1985No. 8421SC886PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

In the preceding appeal, Stanford v. Owens, supra, it was determined that plaintiffs had alleged an enforceable claim for negligent misrepresentation. Thus, the main question raised by this appeal is whether the evidence that plaintiffs presented at trial, when viewed in the light most favorable to them, is sufficient to support the claim stated. We hold that it is and that the verdict against the claim was erroneously directed.

The requirements for an action based on negligent misrepresentation are as follows:

Information Negligently Supplied for the Guidance of Others.

One who…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davidson & Jones, Inc. v. County of New HanoverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Rosenthal v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Beatty v. H. B. Owsley & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Harrold v. DowdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Strawbridge v. Sugar Mountain Resort, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2003
  3. Staley v. LingerfeltCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Powell v. WoldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. CHESAPEAKE MICROFILM v. Eastern Microfilm Sales and Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API