Legal Opinion

Clark v. Bodycombe

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 1976No. 107PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

The single question presented by this appeal is whether the trial judge erred by granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. The Court of Appeals sustained the judgment granting a directed verdict on the premises that: (1) plaintiff failed to show actionable negligence on the part of the defendant and (2) that plaintiff had established her own contributory negligence as a matter of law.

When a defendant moves for a directed verdict pursuant to Rule 50(a), the trial judge must take plaintiff’s evidence to be true, consider all the evidence in the light most favorable to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Lewis v. . WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Bowen v. CONSTRUCTORS EQUIPMENT RENTAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Rappaport v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Norwood v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Martishius v. Carolco Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Potts v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Libby Hill Seafood Restaurants, Inc. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API