Legal Opinion
Weaver v. Bennett
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided March 6, 1963No. 387PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Careful consideration impels the conclusion that the evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, is sufficient to require submission for jury determination of issues as to the alleged negligence of Parrish and as to the alleged contributory negligence of Weaver. Having reached this conclusion, we deem it appropriate to refrain from further discussion of the evidence (relevant to said issues) presently before us. Tucker v. Moorefield, 250 N.C. 340, 342, 108 S.E. 2d 637, and oases cited.
Even so, defendants contend that, under the provisions of G.S. 97-9 and G.S. 97-10,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Driscoll v. TowleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Mature v. AngeloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Warner v. LederSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Lewis v. BarnhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Pettiford v. City of GreensboroDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
- DeArmon v. B. Mears Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Harris v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Kay Management Co., Inc. v. CreasonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.