Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. AME, Inc.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided November 4, 1996No. 8:96-1064-20PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HERLONG, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motion of the third-party defendant, Interstate Sign Company, Inc. (“Interstate”), to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The defendant and third-party plaintiff, AME, Inc. (“AME”), filed a memorandum in opposition to the motion to dismiss.

The court has jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1382 in that the plaintiffs are citizens of Georgia, AME is a citizen of South Carolina, and the amount in controversy is in excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000).

AME leased a crane and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  2. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. International Paper Co. v. Corporex Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Hanover InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API