Legal Opinion
Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.
Plaintiff’s complaint as well as the so-called third-party complaint of the defendant K. Ginsburg, Inc., are sought to be dismissed for legal insufficiency: the original defendants also seek to correct the complaint for indefiniteness and obscurity pursuant to rule 102 of the Rules of Civil Practice and to strike out designated paragraphs for irrelevancy and impertinency pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice.
Plaintiff’s complaint alleges in substance that for almost all of his adult life he was continuously employed in the imitation stone business, which is concentrated in a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Andrew J. Aikens v. State of WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Opera on Tour, Inc. v. WeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Ruza v. RuzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Al Raschid v. News Syndicate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Buffalo Seminary v. McCarthyNew York Supreme Court · 1980