Legal Opinion
Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 29, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtM. Henry Martuscello, J.
Two motions are directed against the third amended complaint herein. K. Ginsburg, Inc., the corporate defendant herein, and the individual defendants Ginsburg move to dismiss the first and second causes thereof, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that the facts therein stated are insufficient to constitute a cause of action. Defendant Seidenberg likewise moves to dismiss the first cause of action, pursuant to the aforesaid subdivision 4 of rule 106 and to dismiss the third cause of action pursuant to subdivision 5 of rule 107 of the Rules of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harriss v. TamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Ruza v. RuzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Al Raschid v. News Syndicate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Brandt v. WinchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Millard v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cherry v. KochNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Luisi v. JWT Group, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1985
- Mendez v. GoroffNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Shelley v. ShelleyNew York Supreme Court · 1999