Legal Opinion
Buffalo Seminary v. McCarthy
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 1980PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
M. Dolores Denman, J.
Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment on its action for specific performance and damages in the amount of $5,000. Defendants Michael and Kathleen McCarthy and the estate of Anna Marie McCarthy have cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, declaring the option to purchase a portion of their land void, and clearing title to that parcel. Defendants have also interposed a counterclaim against plaintiff, in which the estate of Ruth L. Robb, its coexecutors and individual beneficiaries of that *708estate, the law firm of Hodgson, Russ,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- M. O'Neil Supply Co. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- ATI, Inc. v. Ruder & Finn, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Matter of City of New York (Upper N.Y. Bay)New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Jacoby v. . JacobyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Buffalo Seminary v. McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982