Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.

K. Ginsburg, Inc., the corporate defendant herein, and the two individual Ginsburg defendants, move to dismiss the amended complaint herein pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground of legal insufficiency; or in the alternative, move pursuant to subdivision 1 of rule 102 of the Rules, that the plaintiff be required to serve a second amended complaint, making the complaint more definite and certain. The fourth defendant, Isidore Seidenberg, similarly moves for the same relief.

The original complaint setting forth one cause of action was dismissed for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brandt v. WinchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Balabanoff v. Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Hartmann v. WinchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Turton v. New York Recorder Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  3. Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API