Legal Opinion
Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJacob J. Schwartzwald, J.
The corporate and individual defendants Ginsburg and also the defendant Seidenberg separately move to dismiss each of the three causes of action alleged in the second amended complaint for legal insufficiency (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4) or in the alternative for regulatory relief (Rules Civ. Prac., rules 102, 103).
The original complaint contained a single cause of action. It was dismissed for insufficiency with leave to plead over (Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc., 7 Misc 2d 136).
Plaintiff then served an amended complaint containing three causes of action. The first cause of action…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beardsley v. . KilmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Ruza v. RuzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Brandt v. WinchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Gale v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Karash v. KolatchNew York Supreme Court · 1961