Legal Opinion
Ruza v. Ruza
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 20, 1955PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBreitel, J.
Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for legal insufficiency. Special Term denied the motion.
The complaint is substantially a running narrative. It relates a scheme, described as a conspiracy, to destroy the marital and financial status of plaintiff. The scheme is alleged to have been carried forward by plaintiff’s stepsons and the corporation they and plaintiff’s husband dominated. The husband and father is not a party to the action. This scheme is alleged to have been accomplished by a long series of acts. They range from the giving of advice, the secreting of assets, the willful…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Brandt v. WinchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Brandt v. WinchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
3Cited by107 opinions
- Nazeri v. Missouri Valley CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- ATI, Inc. v. Ruder & Finn, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Porter v. Crawford & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Belsky v. LowenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.