Legal Opinion

Barrett v. D & H DRYWALL

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1985No. WCB 81-02757; CA A29349; SC S31782PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

Claimant contends that his preexisting asymptomatic osteoarthritis became symptomatic because of his compensable injury and, therefore, the symptoms, insofar as they produce loss of bodily function and consequent loss of earning capacity, are compensable as being “due to” his compensable injury under ORS 656.214(5). Claimant petitioned for judicial review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, claiming that the Board erred in failing to consider his preexisting osteoarthritis in determining the extent of his permanent disability. The Court of Appeals first reversed the Board and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Surratt v. Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Keefer v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Barrett v. D & H DrywallOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Schleiss v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Caren v. Providence Health Sys. Or. (In re Caren)Oregon Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Consolidated Freightways v. FousheeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Saxton v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API